Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit PowerIsKnowledge's column >>

POWERISKNOWLEDGE

Home Page
Gashki'ewizi
Articles Posted: 148  Links Seeded: 1772
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 2/21/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

As Long As Women Live With a 17th Century Mindset They'll Remain in the Same Old Rut

Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:11 PM EST
politics, women, relationships, men, abuse, corporations, politicians, domestic-violence
By PowerIsKnowledge
Advertise | AdChoices

Women have yet to advance their mindset to the 21st Century and I’ll Tell You Why

 In the 21st Century women are still dependent upon men.

Women are still buying into the hype that they must get married and have babies they can’t afford to take care of especially if the baby’s daddies walk out on them.

Women still buy into the hype that they can’t exist without a man.

Women are still buying into the till death do us part as is evident that they stay with men who abuse them and their children through beatings and/or rape.

Women get married before obtaining skills allowing them to support themselves without the added salary of a man, welfare, food stamps and Section 8 forcing their children to grow up in poverty and horrible neighborhoods because they didn’t allow themselves to reach the age of maturity before getting married.

Women still marry men they settle for and not their life mates.

Women are still buying into a woman isn’t complete unless she has a man in her bed. And men know this and as long as women continue to give men power over them they will continue to remain under the thumbs of these men! For example, men still have the final say on women’s reproduction organs, how much pay they can earn in the job market, how far they can advance in corporate America, how much or how little alimony and child support they can receive, and even how to behave if they are the wife of a military officer or politician just to name a few professions. Some women are even told how to think and how to dress and they do as they are told.

I attended a party a few weeks ago and sat at a table with people I didn’t know. One woman invited another woman on an outing and the woman who was invited replied, I’ll have to ask my husband not I’ll have to see if my husband has something on the calendar for us to do. To me, this is not an adult relationship but a father daughter relationship.

Is there any wonder why women are slow in the climbing the corporate ladder? Women prove themselves weak, ineffective, dependent, and needy as long as they buy into the mindset of their mothers and grandmothers and great grandmothers.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Back To Top | Front Page

Published to:

  • PowerIsKnowledge's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: GOP's War On Women, Mental Health and Wellness, Psych, Soc, Philos, The Cherokee Lodge, Whores and Sluts
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (51)
PowerIsKnowledge

www.WinWithWomen2012.com/Splash web site is the way to go to promote women but how many women will promote other women when so many women believe that men are right in making all decisions for women?

  • 3 votes
Reply#1 - Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:12 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

www.WinWithWomen2012.com/Splash web site is the way to go to promote women but how many women will promote other women when so many women believe that men are right in making all decisions for women?

  • 2 votes
Reply#2 - Mon Nov 21, 2011 1:12 PM EST
Kavika

Good to see you back and posting PIK..

Interesting article, and I believe in many ways true.

Waanakiwin niijii

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:05 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Thanks Kavika.

  • 2 votes
#3.1 - Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:47 AM EST
Reply
Augur Well

I gotta put it this way, two ways actually, I do agree with the thrust of your post my friend, in many ways, I really do. "Women" must "take charge" on many fronts, so to speak, if I have the gist correctly, and I think I do.

But my first thought is, mayhap it should be MEN as well who need to be examining and cured of their "time-honored" precepts of their expectations and biases and, well, just plain stupidity.

Secondly, my friend, I can easily say I do know a number of women pretty much as described, I'm sure we all do. But I'd like to go on record and also say, I know a hell of a lot of women who have absolutely not a thing in common or remotely in kind, not even close, not even in the city or state let alone "the ballpark" that one could define as any point above. Not even.

Successful, independent, educated (some more some less, of course) firm in their convictions, their opinions, their own roles and place and very, very comfortable with all they've accomplished, in business, in private life, with their kids, "D" all the above. They're out there. (unfortunately, I wasn't married to any! ROFL!)

But I daresay we'll find a hell of a lot of them right here on the Vine too! (*grin*!)

  • 2 votes
Reply#4 - Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:13 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

I agree Augur that there are women who don't fit the above description but there are too few women who don't fit the description to make a difference in how men view women. If there was a majority of women who didn't fit the above description wouldn't you have to say that we would see more women in power positions?

  • 3 votes
#4.1 - Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:55 AM EST
Augur Well

If there was a majority of women who didn't fit the above description wouldn't you have to say that we would see more women in power positions?

Oh, I wholeheartedly agree! No doubt!

But I do think it is happening, little by little.

  • 1 vote
#4.2 - Tue Nov 22, 2011 9:28 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

You're absolutely correct Augur, it is happening little by little but I'm curious as to why women refuse to grow with the times in their thinking concerning having to have a man in their lives before gaining success? Why is it so hard for women to break their dependence on men?

  • 3 votes
#4.3 - Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:11 AM EST
Augur Well

Well, I'll be the first to admit I may well be the wrong guy to be asking all that of! Been married, twice, divorced twice, my choice the first time, mutually the second, and I am not looking for the next EX-Mrs Augur! ROFL!

But, that said, I think a lot of those posers' resolutions can be considered a two-way street, looking thru a lot of different prisms if you will. I don't think "typical" at some point in the past, social mores or attitudes, are nearly as prevalent as they once were, not by a long shot. I don't think it's so much a "society wide" issue any more, not like sociologists could readily define past times and attitudes were, but almost down to an individual level these days.

I just see more and more women taking on leadership roles, in business, their own new start-ups, check out some the numbers of new business start-ups, they'll surprise you, in politics, in churches all over the place, just a lot more nowadays than I've seen in past years. And altho I'm older than a lot of trees out there, I'm not "that old" just yet! (*grin*!)

Maybe yer hangin' around the wrong group of ladies! (A joke! Just a joke! LOL!)

  • 1 vote
#4.4 - Wed Nov 23, 2011 8:42 AM EST
Reply
js-445607

I blame Walt Disney for producing all those Cinderella type stories. LOL

I was raised with the assumption that I was required to marry. I took out on my own, found good jobs and liked the single life. Prince Charming came along and I worked harder, had more responsibility and found that Prince Charming liked having me care for him just like his Mommy took care of him. I tried hanging with a couple of other Princes but discovered the same. It could be my generation, who knows. I ended up raising my children alone and supporting them and myself. Those years were pure delight and freedom. Don't get me wrong, I still adore Prince Charming, all of them but sometimes, as it was for me, Prince Charming is like having a difficult child to raise.

  • 4 votes
Reply#5 - Wed Dec 7, 2011 7:06 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Well stated js. Unfortunately, it's not your generation because it's still going on. Women are still taught to find a man to marry them but they are not taught how to choose a mate. They tend to marry with their hearts and not with commonsense. I say hooray for you for getting out of a bad situation. Few mothers teach their sons how to take care of themselves so men are looking to marry women who will take care of them like their mommies did.

Walt Disney produced stories that women bought into to and it made him millions. I guess you can say that women walked bought into the Cinderella type stories with their eyes wide open. They failed to separate fact from fiction.

  • 2 votes
#5.1 - Wed Dec 7, 2011 9:25 PM EST
js-445607

My youngest daughter, 28, told me last year that she was happy to know that if she never married it would be perfectly fine. My son, 33, said he didn't know if he would marry and have children. However, if he met a single mother he wouldn't mind helping her raise her child. My oldest daughter is sixteen years older than my youngest. She found the right mate and they have been married over 22 years. I think making wise choices because it is an individual choice, not pressure is the best approach.

  • 3 votes
#5.2 - Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:35 PM EST
Justice?

Absolutely agreed JS. When society tries to pressure, it always applies it to the wrong points and it usually ends up hurting something fierce. :)

  • 3 votes
#5.3 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 12:56 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

js, I like the way your youngest daughter and son thinks because they think as adults. You son appears wise. I like that he's willing to consider marrying a single mother. So many people have hang-ups when it comes to adoption not understanding that all children have the same needs and that DNA has nothing to do with contributing to the success of a child.

  • 2 votes
#5.4 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:21 AM EST
Reply
Justice?

"They tend to marry with their hearts..."

To a point you are correct. You will find many hearts persuaded by a prince. I think men are raised to view beauty of the person (whether that in inward or outward, or a balance of both perhaps) to be the one of the highest factors in getting married. Women are raised to view stability and potential to take care of them as one of the highest factors. Until society can agree that women can take care of themselves and can provide for their families, just as a man can, our society will continue to push "woman victim" at every chance they get.

Part of equality is taking on responsibility. I taught my daughter that her own responsibility for herself if more important than anything else. That making a choice NOT to go to college and instead just marrying someone who did is the WRONG way to take personal responsibility. My son of course already knows this as he was raised in our society.

I agree with the need to get out of the 17th century mindset. But I believe it is more within the control of women than some believe. Your statement about "Few mothers teach sons to take care of themselves" is a sign of society, not reality. Almost all men can, and DO take care of themselves before they get married. What we perhaps don't teach so well, is that our daughters are not to take on the role of "master of the house." For example, if a guy lives on his own and he leaves his pants on the floor one night, he has to pick them up the next morning. Once he is in a relationship with someone who is the "master of the house," she tells him to pick them up. It is unnecessary and puts her in the role of "taking care" of someone else.

This is not a role these women are given, it is a role women take. Why you might ask...and that would be a good question. It provides a level of self-worth to be in "control" in a relationship. For many relationships, women are actually looked down by other women if they don't. If you have 5 wives talking with each other, exchanging horror stories of what they do for their household, and one of them says, I let him clean up after himself when he is ready, she is generally the one on the outside of the "inner circle" of real women who force the issue when they get the chance. For these women, they have to come out of the 17th century and now have to come to terms with the fact that this guy took care of himself, fed himself, clothed himself and supported himself before she met him. She doesn't need to create a "niche" for herself by controlling these activities.

In a healthy relationship, no one controls the activities of the other. Both roles they perform in the household. Many times, the housework is still for the woman and the construction/electrical/plumbing/roof/automotive work is for the man. But I've been known to do the dishes as my girlfriend cleans the garage. It is individual to the relationship, but no matter what, it has to be a mutual respect. Women have been in the workforce strongly for about 40 years now. When they first started, you'd find men still wanting to control how they did things, not paying them as much, etc. The EXACT same thing is going on in many homes of people who have not figured it out.

If you don't want to do his laundry...DON'T do it! If you don't want to wash the dishes, DON'T do it. You are a couple and he will get to it when it reaches his threshold. Many times, just increasing ones own threshold takes care of hundreds of issues...but then what would we complain about? :)

  • 2 votes
Reply#6 - Wed Dec 7, 2011 10:08 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Justice. They tend to marry with their hearts..."

To a point you are correct. You will find many hearts persuaded by a prince.

When the heart is involved I don't think any persuasion is necessary.

I think men are raised to view beauty of the person (whether that in inward or outward, or a balance of both perhaps) to be the one of the highest factors in getting married. Women are raised to view stability and potential to take care of them as one of the highest factors. Until society can agree that women can take care of themselves and can provide for their families, just as a man can, our society will continue to push "woman victim" at every chance they get.

"Woman victim," great way to describe it.

Part of equality is taking on responsibility. I taught my daughter that her own responsibility for herself if more important than anything else. That making a choice NOT to go to college and instead just marrying someone who did is the WRONG way to take personal responsibility. My son of course already knows this as he was raised in our society.

Why do you think it's so important to those who promote marriage over equality? Why wouldn't we want to teach women the importance of learning to take care of themselves first? Yes, equality is taking on responsibility.

I agree with the need to get out of the 17th century mindset. But I believe it is more within the control of women than some believe.

Hasn't it always been in the control of women to change their mindset?

Your statement about "Few mothers teach sons to take care of themselves" is a sign of society, not reality. Almost all men can, and DO take care of themselves before they get married.

I don't think so when their girlfriends are cleaning their apartments, washing their clothing and cooking their meals.

What we perhaps don't teach so well, is that our daughters are not to take on the role of "master of the house." For example, if a guy lives on his own and he leaves his pants on the floor one night, he has to pick them up the next morning. Once he is in a relationship with someone who is the "master of the house," she tells him to pick them up. It is unnecessary and puts her in the role of "taking care" of someone else.

So true.

This is not a role these women are given, it is a role women take. Why you might ask...and that would be a good question. It provides a level of self-worth to be in "control" in a relationship. For many relationships, women are actually looked down by other women if they don't. If you have 5 wives talking with each other, exchanging horror stories of what they do for their household, and one of them says, I let him clean up after himself when he is ready, she is generally the one on the outside of the "inner circle" of real women who force the issue when they get the chance. For these women, they have to come out of the 17th century and now have to come to terms with the fact that this guy took care of himself, fed himself, clothed himself and supported himself before she met him. She doesn't need to create a "niche" for herself by controlling these activities.

In other words you're saying that women do what they do to please others and to make friends?

In a healthy relationship, no one controls the activities of the other. Both roles they perform in the household. Many times, the housework is still for the woman and the construction/electrical/plumbing/roof/automotive work is for the man. But I've been known to do the dishes as my girlfriend cleans the garage. It is individual to the relationship, but no matter what, it has to be a mutual respect. Women have been in the workforce strongly for about 40 years now. When they first started, you'd find men still wanting to control how they did things, not paying them as much, etc. The EXACT same thing is going on in many homes of people who have not figured it out.

Haven't figured it out or prefer not to change?

If you don't want to do his laundry...DON'T do it! If you don't want to wash the dishes, DON'T do it. You are a couple and he will get to it when it reaches his threshold. Many times, just increasing ones own threshold takes care of hundreds of issues...but then what would we complain about? :)

I wonder how many women would get a black eye if they didn't do the chores?

  • 1 vote
Reply#7 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:40 AM EST
Justice?

In other words you're saying that women do what they do to please others and to make friends?

In a way yes...no one really does anything just to please others. They receive a sense of accomplishment from it. They feel like they are important, or are needed by choosing to do these things. But it's not just women...it is all humans. They just show it in different venues. The guy who stays late at work to finish up that report, or gives his coat to his girlfriend who is cold...each gives the "giver" a sense of accomplishment, or being needed. Now, if after the guy stayed late or gave up his jacket, then said to his friends the next day, "My stupid boss makes me stay late" or "I can't believe she didn't bring her own jacket," suddenly what was done for the good of others has turned into doing it for something to complain about. It is not being true to oneself and it is certainly not being fair to the boss or the girlfriend.

I wonder how many women would get a black eye if they didn't do the chores?

VERY, VERY few! And for those who are in this type of relationship, the overall status of relationships in America is the least of their concerns. It is blown WAY out of proportion in the media with "domestic violence" meaning a man beats a woman. The following information is EXTREMELY important to understand if one is to understand the term domestic violence and what the term then conjures up in the mind, due to special interest, our media and political climate. If you look up the numbers in domestic violence cases, reciprocated violence is about half of all cases, and in a majority of the cases, the woman struck first. In one-directional violence, women again are a higher percentage of the total. Spousal beating, or battering with injury is a completely different animal, and a VERY, VERY small percentage of what encompasses the blanket they throw out as domestic violence, but media and politicians would have you believe they are one in the same. The VAWA is important, but unfortunately doesn't cover all people. It should have been the VAHA, substituting "human" for "women." What it has intentionally done (by special interest and politicians), has blinded the public to the entire issue of domestic violence and instead, has refocused them on a a very small percentage, making it seem like it is ALL cases. It is a win-win for politicians and special interest...but a lose-lose for Americans, our families, our children and our society as a whole.

From Harvard on a study of 11,000 men and women:

"Almost 25% of the people surveyed — 28% of women and 19% of men — said there was some violence in their relationship. Women admitted perpetrating more violence (25% versus 11%) as well as being victimized more by violence (19% versus 16%) than men did. According to both men and women, 50% of this violence was reciprocal, that is, involved both parties, and in those cases the woman was more likely to have been the first to strike."

http://www.patientedu.org/aspx/HealthELibrary/HealthETopic.aspx?cid=M0907d

  • 2 votes
#7.1 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 1:12 PM EST
Reply
northern girl

I find this article somewhat offensive. I know I dont need anyone to take care of me. I make my own choices, and the vast majority of the women I know do the same. Some women WANT to become wives and mothers. Some want to be home makers. Others dont, but ALL of them make that choice for themselves.

As to the division of household chores, its a pretty even split. I cook because, quite frankly, I like food and Im much better at it than he is. He cleans up the kitchen after dinner. We each do our own laundry, and we spend equal time scrubbing the toilet, vacuuming, etc.

I’ll have to ask my husband

I'll admit Ive used this one because I couldnt come up with a reason to say "no" on the spot and didnt want to hurt anyone's feelings. It buys more time to come up with a better lie. Now, if my other half (we've never married after 12 years) happens to be with me, he can tell by the way I ask the question of if we have anything going on as to whether or not I really cant remember off hand or if I dont want to make plans with the person asking.

  • 2 votes
Reply#8 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:15 AM EST
SCTexan

IMO, if you're not happy with yourself, you'll never be happy with someone else. To many, both sexes, are looking for someone else to make them happy or take care of them. I think that even manifests itself in our public / societal demands too.

  • 3 votes
#8.1 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:45 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

So true SCTexan. Some women marry to get from under the thumbs of their parent(s). Some men marry so they'll have someone to cook, do laundry, clean up after them and to have a convenient sexual partner on hand. And I have to agree with you when you say I think that even manifests itself in our public / societal demands too.

  • 2 votes
#8.2 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 6:28 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

northern girl, I never leave comments or seeds or article I find offensive or somewhat offensive. Why do you think you did?

  • 2 votes
#8.3 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 6:33 PM EST
northern girl

Why did I? Because you are acting like women have no minds and cannot take care of themselves. Your words:

Women have yet to advance their mindset to the 21st Century and I’ll Tell You Why

In the 21st Century women are still dependent upon men.

Just because YOU think women are mindless chattel, doesnt make it so. Why would you write an article like this? Do you enjoy bashing women?

  • 3 votes
#8.4 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:35 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

northern girl, it appears that you lack the maturity to participate in a discussion such as this if you even understand what a discussion is. Please move on.

  • 2 votes
#8.5 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 8:55 PM EST
northern girl

Women still marry men they settle for and not their life mates.

Women are still buying into the hype that they must get married and have babies they can’t afford to take care of

Women are still buying into the till death do us part

Women get married before obtaining skills allowing them to support themselves without the added salary of a man

Women are still buying into a woman isn’t complete unless she has a man in her bed

So you write an article bashing women and throw in a CoH violation or two for good measure, yet I'M the one not mature enough for a discussion like this. Nice! The vast majority of women are not living in a 17th century mindset, no matter how you try to twist things to make it seem so. What I havent been able to figure out is who you hate more? Men or women?

  • 5 votes
#8.6 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:23 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

I recently watched an episode of Dr. Drew's Liferchangers where women were allowed to ask a panel of men questions. One woman asked the question "How can I tell when my lover is telling the truth about not having sex with his wife." The responses were priceless. She was asked why was she dating a married man. She was told that the man was, absolutely, having sex with his wife and why wouldn't he?

What I havent been able to figure out is who you hate more? Men or women?

Why would you care?

Why are you taking this so personally?

It is clear that you lack the skills to debate. In a debate, once you start attacking to try to prove your point, people who are skilled in debating stop taking you seriously. When they stop taking you seriously, they ignore you.

  • 2 votes
#8.7 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 8:17 AM EST
js-445607

My daughters, stepdaughters, granddaughter are not mate focused. However, being around some of their peers I've found that the Cinderella syndrome is alive and well. Celebrity serial dating and marriage is part of the problem. When a married woman separates from her husband and hooks up with someone else within days or weeks that is a red flag for me.

When I was married the first time and my husband wanted a divorce he told me he was afraid to live alone. I wasn't afraid to live alone and after his behavior I was looking forward to this. I asked him why he didn't want to live alone where he could learn more about himself and he said that was the problem, he didn't want to know. So perhaps this is one reason people hook up and never understand anything about themselves.

Your article focuses upon women, PowerIsKnowledge, but the problem is as much a male problem and a female problem. I think there is mention of men wanting their mommies in one or more posts so the combination of the male and female both looking for someone to take care of them is pretty equal.

  • 3 votes
#8.8 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 12:57 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

The reason the article focuses specifically on women is because its about the behaviors and mindsets of women that keep them from enjoying the same rewards as men. The article is intended explore why women continue to use the same Victorian behaviors that keep them from moving forward. This topic came up in a discussion when someone asked why aren't women moving forward at a faster pace and from the efforts of women who are trying to effect positive change for women www.WinWithWomen2012.com/Splash. Bringing the behaviors of men in on this topic will not address the title of this article.

Yes, men do behave badly and they still have17th Century mindsets but it doesn't keep them from achieving goals in large numbers.

If a child is born out of wedlock does it keep the baby's daddy from college if that's the goal? How often does it affect the baby's daddy financially? A baby's daddy can owe child support but we all know women who don't receive it.

The large percentage of women and children who are poor and who are homeless rarely have anything to do with the men they choose to bare children with but with the bad choices they've made. I'm trying to learn why so many women choose stagnation over success. Blaming men for all the bad choices women make will not advance the 17th century mindset to the 21 century mindset. Getting pissed off, attacking, placing blame and denial is not dealing with the topic.

There are two books that explore why men behave badly The Peter Pan Syndrome: Men Who Have Never Grown Up by Dan Kiley and What Men Don't Want Women To Know: The Secrets, The Lies, The Unspoken Truth by Smith and Doe.

The women who read these books and who didn't go into denial changed their mindsets on how they viewed future relationships. Not only that, they stopped choosing the same type of man over and over.

The responses I've seen on this thread, with the exception of a few, have come from emotions and not facts.

  • 2 votes
#8.9 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 2:10 PM EST
Sally

northern girl, it appears that you lack the maturity to participate in a discussion such as this if you even understand what a discussion is.

PowerIsKnowledge, mind the Code of Honor please.

Above all else, respect others. Address issues and arguments and refrain from making personal attacks.

  • 6 votes
#8.10 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 2:23 PM EST
Reply
DV-966373

For a lot of women "I'll have to ask my husband" is a brilliant way of getting out of an invitation that you don't want to say no to because it will hurt someone's feelings. Whenever I get invited to something I don't want to do I always give the whole "I'll have to check with my better half first and get back to you." And I'm more than willing to play the bad guy to give my spouse that convenient excuse as well.

  • 2 votes
#9 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 10:25 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Then you're describing cowards or users. If you're an adult, why not respond as an adult.

  • 2 votes
#9.1 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 6:31 PM EST
js-445607

Perhaps some get married to use each other as excuses, PowerIsKnowledge! When I would overhear my husband say, "I think my better half messed up" when he'd messed up or "I'd better check with my better half" when he knew that was bunk I'd raise a fuss with him and tell I was not his "excuse" for anyone or anything.

  • 2 votes
#9.2 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 7:00 PM EST
DV-966373

We don't blame our mess ups on each other. But when my spouse has trouble getting out of something without hurting someone's feelings, I say "Tell them I won't let you. Tell them I already made plans for us. Tell them you're not allowed. Whatever. Blame it on me. Then you can politely get out of it." It's a little white lie that keeps us from being suckered into AMWAY meetings and such. It works for us.

  • 4 votes
#9.3 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 8:18 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Perhaps some get married to use each other as excuses, PowerIsKnowledge! When I would overhear my husband say, "I think my better half messed up" when he'd messed up or "I'd better check with my better half" when he knew that was bunk I'd raise a fuss with him and tell I was not his "excuse" for anyone or anything.

js, only a mature indivdual will respond as you did. Anyone who would use another as an excuse to get out of something lacks integrity and maturity and is a coward.

  • 2 votes
#9.4 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:00 PM EST
DV-966373

A mature individual wouldn't judge another couple's relationship based on one sentence.

I guess I COULD reply as an "adult" with the truth, which would go something like this "Hell no, I'm not coming to your stupid AMWAY party. I've got better things to do than sit around with a bunch of people I don't know listening to sales pitches about products I don't want so that you can make money off of me." Huh. Sometimes being "adult" just isn't kind. And I would rather be kind. It doesn't hurt anyone.

I'm not sure why anyone would find this so offensive, when it doesn't affect them in the slightest.

  • 4 votes
#9.5 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:18 PM EST
js-445607

Oh my, DV, that would be my line, altered a bit but quite the same. Whenever someone asks me to play Bunko, attend a Tupperware, candle, jewelry, exotic or other party I'll tell them no way, that's not my gig. I even balk at wedding and baby showers and got irritated when a relative threw a baby shower for my last child. I told her I was on my third baby and if I didn't save the baby stuff from the others that was my bad and not the responsibility of the family and friends to provide me with more.

I think people just need to lighten up and say what they mean, no beating around the bush or making excuses for themselves. If it is a close friend I'll say, "Hell No, I Won't Go" and they always laugh.

  • 2 votes
#9.6 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:26 PM EST
DV-966373

If I think it is someone who can take no for an answer, I'll usually say something like "I prefer not to shop that way." Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there who won't take no for an answer. When you know you're going to be treated to a litany of reasons why their home based business is better/different than all the others you've experienced, sometimes it is just easier to have an excuse handy. And I'm not at all ashamed that I use my spouse as a fall guy, and vice versa. We are a team, and we back each other up like that, because we care more about each other than we care about somebody's home business.

My "close" friends already know how I feel, so I don't need to have excuses for them. But it's not really worth the hassle/effort to explain my abhorrence of direct marketing to someone I'm not close to. I don't think the fact that my spouse and I rely on each other for this type of backup makes either of us weak, co-dependent, or domineering. Just the opposite. I think it makes us a strong, well matched, successful team.

  • 4 votes
#9.7 - Thu Dec 8, 2011 9:43 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Oh my, DV, that would be my line, altered a bit but quite the same. Whenever someone asks me to play Bunko, attend a Tupperware, candle, jewelry, exotic or other party I'll tell them no way, that's not my gig. I even balk at wedding and baby showers and got irritated when a relative threw a baby shower for my last child. I told her I was on my third baby and if I didn't save the baby stuff from the others that was my bad and not the responsibility of the family and friends to provide me with more.

I think people just need to lighten up and say what they mean, no beating around the bush or making excuses for themselves. If it is a close friend I'll say, "Hell No, I Won't Go" and they always laugh.

js, I'm with you. I have a client who wanted to give me religious material. I told her thanks but no thanks. She asked why I didn't want it. I told her I was an atheist. She told me she was surprised because I seem to be a good person. I told her I'm a good person because I'm not a believer. She asked me why was I an atheist. I told I was an atheist for the same reason she was a christian. She was a believer and I wasn't.

I could have taken the material and ended the discussion for that day but I knew it would have come up again and I didn't want that so I nipped it in the bud. Religion no longer comes up in any of our conversations. I could have lied but I chose not to because that's not how adults handle their business.

  • 2 votes
#9.8 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 8:27 AM EST
DV-966373

I could have lied but I chose not to because that's not how adults handle their business.

Adults handle their business however they want to. It's one of the perks of being an adult.

  • 4 votes
#9.9 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 8:34 AM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

Adults handle their business in dignity, truth, honesty and integrity.

  • 2 votes
#9.10 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 8:47 AM EST
DV-966373

Adults know when they're being baited. Goodbye.

  • 4 votes
#9.11 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 9:43 AM EST
Justice?

Children say the darnedest things...

While, as adults, we want to confront situations and not shy away from them, I think everyone here acknowledges the need for civility. When one feels like a comment might be "mean," as an adult, we often use different words to express the same outcome without disrespecting others.

Children only have limited experience and vocabulary, and are generally self-centered without the ability to show empathy to others. Empathy is a learned behavior. It is one of the reasons why an only-child has more difficulty learning to share, especially before they are in a social environment like school.

The choices we make as adults to show empathy to others are based on what has shown to give us the best results for our situation. Some people like to be confronted with the truth, even if it hurts. Those people are likely to respond the way they would like someone to respond to them. That is not wrong, it is a choice. Others would like someone to buffer the response, so as not to hurt their feelings. Those people are also more likely to respond the way they would like someone to respond to them. That is also not wrong. It is a choice.

Either way, the answer is understood, and it is up to the two people in the conversation to determine if they felt like they were respected, and gave respect, during the dialog. If both parties leave the conversation with respect, then the method employed worked. If those involved are OK with the conversation, then handling it another way is just an alternate method to achieve the same result.

And as js stated, your response of course can change depending on how you, as an individual, reacts to different situations. If you are more comfortable saying "Hell, no" to anyone who asks the question, you risk alienating someone who doesn't know you well enough to smile. But does it matter? That's up to you. If you are more comfortable changing your response based on the other person (stranger, friend, family, etc.), then you are in a constant state of trying to come up with the right way to respond. But does it matter? That's up to you.

I can see valid points in both ways to handle it, but I don't judge either. I think both are fine, as long as the person is responding in a way they would like to be responded to. If it entails disrespect, well...that's another ball of wax.

  • 4 votes
#9.12 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 12:02 PM EST
northern girl

Well said, Justice!

  • 3 votes
#9.13 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 12:18 PM EST
js-445607

I have Jehovah Witness that visit several times a year. They are the same two women so I would guess this is their territory. They are two of the sweetest women and each time I thank them for stopping by, refuse their offering and wish them a good day. I think they keep coming back as they never get a rebuff for their efforts. As a non-believer I want them to realize that non-believers can be a good as they believe their faith grants them. What does it take from me but a few seconds of my time? Like, "Oh bummer, I could have been cleaning the kitty litter, but no, I had to deal with "them", so I think that tiny effort is well worth my time and theirs.

My sister would stand hands on hips, scowl on face ready for full on attack whenever anyone came around with a petition, religious pamphlet or whatever. She was in a tizzy afterward. My approach leaves out the anger and tizzy so this is what I prefer. Different approaches for different people and that's just fine with me.

  • 4 votes
#9.14 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 1:09 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

I agree with the different approaches for different people but one had better know the people they are lying to very well especially if they want to keep those people in their life. I personally can't deal with liars. I don't trust them. I handle them with a long handle spoon.

  • 2 votes
#9.15 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 2:16 PM EST
Justice?

"Oh bummer, I could have been cleaning the kitty litter..."

Oh geez!...there you go again, now I need ANOTHER keyboard. Coffee this time! :-)

  • 3 votes
#9.16 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 3:57 PM EST
js-445607

My bad, Justice, just trying to lighten the load.

PowerIsKnowledge, when I was 5 years old I stood before my birthday cake and announced, "I will never tell a lie because I'll get a spanking anyway and I will not cry "wait for me" any longer" My older siblings were continually setting me up for a fall and fibbing about me. I decided that I would not be like them as it made me feel terribly bad and it was cheating. I wasn't about to practice this with my friends.

  • 1 vote
#9.17 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 4:18 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

There's a difference from telling a lie to save your life and telling a lie to get out of a party invitation. I'm honest and upfront with my friends and they are the same way with me. If I invite them to participate in something they don't like they tell me they won't participate because they don't like it. Never have they said I have to check with my spouse. Also, I have different friends for different events. I would never invite a friend to the theatre who don't like like the theatre. My friends and I have no fear of telling it like it is with one another. But none of this has anything to do with the topic, does it?

  • 2 votes
#9.18 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 5:33 PM EST
js-445607

But none of this has anything to do with the topic, does it?

Well if we include self-deception then perhaps it has everything to do with the topic. If we can without conscious tell another a fib to get us where we are going then how different is this in telling ourselves that having a mate will solve all our problems? Isn't this the bottom line about being true to oneself in contrast to being dependent upon others? If women are still in a 17th century mindset they certainly haven't learned to be their own lead in life and must make excuses for themselves.

  • 2 votes
#9.19 - Fri Dec 9, 2011 5:42 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

How does it benefit one adult when another adult lies to them?

Isn't truth tied to trust?

Isn't a lie tied to distrust?

Isn't truth tied to integrity?

  • 2 votes
#9.20 - Wed Dec 14, 2011 8:11 AM EST
Justice?

Well, as we get older, we understand that there is a difference in lying that hurts someone else and truthful rudeness that hurts someone else. The end result is that we as humans show respect for others, and if that means softening a statement so as not to intentionally hurt someone else, and the statement itself doesn't hurt someone else, you're on the right road.

It is absolutely OK for one to go through life not caring about how their statements affect others, falling back on the "truth" as a reason. That is a choice and it will affect who wants to be around you. Friends and family (and everyone) like to be around people where they feel good about themselves in their company. If someone feels like crap about themselves when they are around you, they're going to not want to be around you. If you care about how others feel in your presence, the "truth" is not necessary in all cases. If you're not going to go to a dinner party, the reasons are inconsequential to the person inviting. If you say "No, I really don't like your children," because it is the truth, it hurts them. If you say, "I can't make it, I have something else going on," the end result is the same, but the person doesn't feel emotionally connected to your response.

Neither is better than the other, it's just a personal choice. Is your goal to get them to be more aware of their nasty children, or is it solely to decline the offer? For an adult, it's the ability to choose using empathy, or black and white "truth, even if it hurts" mentality. Children don't have this ability, so they go with whatever is on their mind. Please understand, I'm not saying those that use the "truth in all cases" have no empathy. I'm saying that they have a choice to make keeping in mind that their response has an effect. To not be aware of that would be juvenile, to understand it and use it, or not use it, to have a desired effect is an adult just making a decision.

  • 4 votes
#9.21 - Wed Dec 14, 2011 1:06 PM EST
PowerIsKnowledge

All of my friends know that I don't like other peoples adolescent and teen children or their pets. They know that I won't ride in their vehicles if they have had their pets in them. They also know that I don't want their pets jumping on me. All of my friends know I will tell them the truth and that I expect the same of them. None of us lie to one another to spare feelings. None of us are sensitive to the truth or allergic to it. I guess that's the difference between adult relationships/friendships and non-adult relationships/friendships. But my friends and I have been friends for longer than thirty years and know one another well. We don't consider being told the truth as being mean--we consider being told the truth as being trustworthy.

My newest friendships is about ten years old. They know how important integrity is with me in friendships. They also know once integrity is no longer in the friendships, the friendships are over. I can't be around someone I can't and don't trust and they feel the same. My friends and I like the honesty and integrity we have in our friendships because it works.

Integrity and honesty doesn't work for everyone. I don't have a problem with anyone whose friendships work on lies and deceit--to each his/her own.

  • 1 vote
#9.22 - Mon Jan 2, 2012 10:51 AM EST
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com