Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit PowerIsKnowledge's column >>

POWERISKNOWLEDGE

Home Page
Gashki'ewizi
Articles Posted: 150  Links Seeded: 1793
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

The 1830 Indian Removal Act

Seeded on Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:03 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: PBS
history, congress, government, president, senate, supreme-court, newsvine, indians, slavery, native-americans, slaves, cherokee, creek, andrew-jackson, seminole, choctaw, chicasaw
Seeded by PowerIsKnowledge
Advertise | AdChoices

Early in the 19th century, while the rapidly-growing United States expanded into the lower South, white settlers faced what they considered an obstacle. This area was home to the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chicasaw and Seminole nations. These Indian nations, in the view of the settlers and many other white Americans, were standing in the way of progress. Eager for land to raise cotton, the settlers pressured the federal government to acquire Indian territory.

The Indian Removal Act of 1830

[This was the Jackson-era legislation authorizing the president to transfer Eastern Indian tribes to the western territories promised (falsely) "in perpetuity". The actual relocation culminated in the 1838 "Trail of Tears" forced march, one of the most shameful occurrences in the history of federal domestic policy.]

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • PowerIsKnowledge's Column
  • Groups: History Uncovered
  • Regions: none
  • Public Discussion (5)
PowerIsKnowledge

In 1823 the Supreme Court handed down a decision which stated that Indians could occupy lands within the United States, but could not hold title to those lands. This was because their "right of occupancy" was subordinate to the United States' "right of discovery." In response to the great threat this posed, the Creeks, Cherokee, and Chicasaw instituted policies of restricting land sales to the government. They wanted to protect what remained of their land before it was too late.

Although the five Indian nations had made earlier attempts at resistance, many of their strategies were non-violent. One method was to adopt Anglo-American practices such as large-scale farming, Western education, and slave-holding. This earned the nations the designation of the "Five Civilized Tribes." They adopted this policy of assimilation in an attempt to coexist with settlers and ward off hostility. But it only made whites jealous and resentful.

Because the European settlers wanted the land that wasn't their's, they participated in the thief.

  • 1 vote
Reply#1 - Tue Jul 26, 2011 8:01 AM EDT
Kavika

This is one of the saddest chapters in American History. Appx. 8,000 died during this march. I have a copy of a letter written by a U.S. Solider that was a guard on this. His compassion for the Indians is evident as were his actions.

This did not end the removel of NA from their land. There are many other forced re locations of NA's that were horrible. The Ojibwe Trail of Tears, called the Sandy Lake Tragedy cost the lives of between 500 and 1,000 Ojibwe from starvation, disease and cold. The story goes on and on. In much of this Lincoln was at the helm of the country.

Good post Power.

  • 1 vote
Reply#2 - Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:45 AM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

I spent some time trying to learn if this Act has been removed from the books, but couldn't find anything. Do you know if this Act is still on the books, Kavika?

  • 1 vote
#2.1 - Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:50 AM EDT
Kavika

I believe it was taken out, but I'm not positive on that Power. Other ruses were used to try to move the Ojiwe, Dakota, etc. They Ojibwe retained their homeland, by refusing to move and fighting back. ''The Battle of Sugar Point''...Amazingly the white settlers in the Mn. Wisc. area were so disgusted with the way the U.S. was treating the Ojibwe that they rallied in support of them, and forced the U.S. Gov't to back off and let them stay in their traditional lands.

SCOTUS ruled the Indian Removel Act. not valid, but Jackson over road SCOTUS and did it anyway.

    #2.2 - Tue Jul 26, 2011 10:58 AM EDT
    PowerIsKnowledge

    Well I guess that confirms it, thanks.

    • 1 vote
    #2.3 - Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:28 PM EDT
    Reply
    Leave a Comment:
    You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
    You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
    (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
    Newsvine Privacy Statement
    As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
    FUN STUFF:
    • Leaderboard |
    • E-Mail Alerts |
    • Top of the Vine |
    • Newsvine Live |
    • Newsvine Archives |
    • The Greenhouse |
    COMPANY STUFF:
    • Code of Honor |
    • Company Info |
    • Contact Us |
    • Jobs |
    • User Agreement |
    • Privacy Policy |
    • About our ads
    LEGAL STUFF:
    • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
    • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com