Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit PowerIsKnowledge's column >>

POWERISKNOWLEDGE

Home Page
Gashki'ewizi
Articles Posted: 150  Links Seeded: 1793
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Republicans Want to Kick 1.3 Million Vets Off VA Health-Care to Save the Cost of Keeping Troops in Iraq and Afghanistan

Seeded on Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:30 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: OpEdNews.Com Progressive
politics, holland, joshua
Seeded by PowerIsKnowledge
Advertise | AdChoices

A billion can be a big number to wrap one's head around. If you had a billion dollars in $1000 bills, the stack would weigh 2,200 pounds!

This year, we'll spend $170 billion to keep troops in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I think that's a handy weigh of expressing big numbers. It works out to $465 million each and very day, or $19.4 million per hour.

Last week, The Hill reported that the Obama administration "might have thrown a wrench into Senate Democratic plans to pass what they see as a jobs bill — by implying the bill spends too much money." (You gotta love The Hill  -- they write that Democrats 'see it as a jobs bill,' but the bill in question would increase the budget for the the Public Works and Economic Development Administration, which directly creates jobs.) At issue is a difference of $175 million in funding, which is what it costs to keep troops in Iraq and Afghanistan for 9 hours.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • PowerIsKnowledge's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: none
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (37)
PowerIsKnowledge

Republican Paul Ryan and the House of Representatives are looking to end VA healthcare for over 1.3 million veterans who are Priority 7 & 8. These veterans are the least disabled veterans using the system, usually with disability ratings of 0 percent or no service-connected disability. According to the Congressional Budget Office “Option 35,” the cuts would leave 130,000 veterans with no healthcare alternative. This means veterans with conditions not recognized by the VA, like certain diseases from Agent Orange exposure, would have to pay for healthcare out of pocket if they had not other service connected disability.

It truly saddens me when I hear of any politician wanting to take anything away from veterans.

  • 8 votes
#1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:32 AM EDT
Felicitie

Agent Orange veterans would not be given the boot. From the actual PROPOSAL:

To be

eligible for VA medical services under this option, a veteran

would have to qualify for a higher priority group

by demonstrating a service-connected disability, by

documenting income and assets that were below the

means-testing thresholds, or by qualifying under other

criteria (such as exposure to Agent Orange, status as a

Purple Heart recipient or a former prisoner of war,

eligibility for Medicaid, or catastrophic non-serviceconnected

disability).

More facts from the actual proposal:

In 2007, 90 percent of enrollees

in priority groups 7 and 8 had other health care coverage,

most notably Medicare and private health insurance. As a

result, the vast majority of the veterans who would lose

VA coverage under this option would have continued

access to other sources of coverage, and veterans without

other health insurance options could be eligible to obtain

coverage through health insurance exchanges in future.

    #1.1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:00 AM EDT
    btco

    I just spent the day with my better half's Motorcycle Club holding a pig roast at a local VA home here in my area. We brought all the food and drinks and music. Had a blast. I spent the day talking to different veterans living there that served in 5 different wars. The stories were good, bad and very sad. Cried a couple of times over what I was told. One Vietnam Vet has spent the previous 25 years living on the streets of Denver before his sister finally found him, brought him home and got him in the local VA. He has PTSD that was never diagnosed or treated and has suffered for decades. He deserves all the care he gets at the VA.

    To try and cut funding for ANY of these wonderful people is dead wrong. No if's and's or but's.

    According to the Congressional Budget Office "Option 35," the cuts would leave 130,000 veterans with no healthcare alternative.

    So Felicitie, Is this what you support? Ending care for Veterans? Really?

    How many more times to we need to see how heartless and evil Ryan and the GOP have become? When do we finally stand up and tell them to shove it?

    • 6 votes
    #1.2 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:02 PM EDT
    Felicitie

    In 2007, 90 percent of enrollees

    in priority groups 7 and 8 had other health care coverage,

    most notably Medicare and private health insurance. As a

    result, the vast majority of the veterans who would lose

    VA coverage under this option would have continued

    access to other sources of coverage, and veterans without

    other health insurance options could be eligible to obtain

    coverage through health insurance exchanges in future.

      #1.3 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:05 PM EDT
      btco

      Felicitie,
      I am assuming you support cutting VA care for Vets.

      Whatever.

      VA healthcare is really just a cost of doing business. You break it; you buy it.

      • 4 votes
      #1.4 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:22 PM EDT
      Felicitie

      Ninety percent of groups 7 and 8 have other health care coverage. The ten percent who don't will get it with Obamacare.

      No one will go without health coverage.

        #1.5 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:37 PM EDT
        btco

        Direct question

        Yes or No

        Do you support cutting funding for the VA as proposed by Ryan?

        • 5 votes
        #1.6 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 2:13 PM EDT
        Felicitie

        Yes. I support cutting any funding that is duplicitous or wasteful. Why don't you?

          #1.7 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:17 PM EDT
          chitownty

          No vet should have to go shopping around for 'other' health coverage.If the Republicans want to continue to fund Afganistan,have them end subsidies to big oil,big pharma,and big ag.Talk about duplicitous waste! Wounded vets earned that,I don't give a damn what it costs.

          • 2 votes
          #1.8 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:37 PM EDT
          btco

          Yes. I support cutting any funding that is duplicitous or wasteful. Why don't you?

          I don't support it because I have a @!$%#ing heart and give a @!$%# about other people.

          By the way, dip @!$%# heartless corporate whore @!$%#wit Paul Ryan's plan also does away with the new health reform law. That quote you kept repeating is worthless for those Vets. There would be no health care exchange if we enacted the callous bullhsit Ryan plan. Those Veterans that served our country and cannot afford health care, will be left like the Vietnam vet I met at the VA, @!$%#ing homeless without a hope or a prayer. @!$%# you very much GOP.

          Why don't you come with me and the club on our next visit to the VA home. Meet a few of the Vets you feel we are "wasting" tax dollars on, how about it? Tell them to their face how much we appreciate their service, but too @!$%#ing bad and so @!$%#ing sad, we cannot afford to waste money on your care.

          @!$%#ing heartless GOP bull@!$%#.

          • 5 votes
          #1.9 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 7:08 PM EDT
          PowerIsKnowledge

          btco, I like your passion.

          • 3 votes
          #1.10 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:29 PM EDT
          Felicitie

          No vet will go shopping around for other health care coverage. Ninety percent of them already have other health care coverage. No vet will be denied coverage. I posted the actual wording of the proposal. Go read it.

            #1.11 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:57 AM EDT
            btco

            and veterans without

            other health insurance options could be eligible to obtain

            coverage through health insurance exchanges in future.

            Ryan's plan and all the GOP plans are to END the health insurance exchanges that the new health care law put in place, leaving veterans without any options. Heartless bull@!$%#.

            You wrote......

            No vet will go shopping around for other health care coverage.

            From the CBO report...

            A disadvantage of the option is that veterans enrolled in
            priority groups 7 and 8 who have come to rely on VA for
            at least part of their medical care might find their health
            care disrupted by the change in enrollment rules. Some of
            those veterans particularly those whose income was just
            above the income thresholds might have difficulty
            identifying other sources of care. In addition, because of
            the relatively low out-of-pocket cost to veterans for VA
            health care, veterans switching to alternative sources of
            care might pay more than they would have paid at VA.

            Here, go volunteer at a VA in your area. Get to know the "waste" as you put it.

            • 4 votes
            #1.12 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 9:55 AM EDT
            Felicitie

            I'm sure veterans who love this country enough to put their lives on the line for it would want wasteful spending cut as well. Again ninety percent of these veterans already have other coverage and the ten percent that don't will get coverage through other means. No veteran will lose coverage.

            If you want to make this an "I hate veterans" meme you are sorely mistaken. My Father served in WW2 and assorted uncles, aunts, cousins, brothers, and sisters served in the military. It ain't about that. It's about wasting money that is not needed. It's a shuffling of numbers because those veterans will use medicare/medicaid and other entitlements to fund their medical care. The money isn't disappearing, it's just being shuffled around.

            I don't think I'm going to defuse your anger, though. Be well.

              #1.13 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 10:01 AM EDT
              btco

              Go volunteer, meet one of the veterans this will impact, face to face. Tell them. how you give a @!$%#.

              • 3 votes
              #1.14 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 11:59 AM EDT
              Felicitie

              Veterans in priority

              group 8 do not have service-connected disabilities, and

              their annual income or net worth exceeds both VA’s

              means-testing thresholds and VA’s geographic income

              thresholds, which are updated annually. Veterans enrolled

              in priority group 7 have no service-connected disabilities,

              and their income is above the VA’s means-testing threshold

              but below the VA’s geographic index. About 2.3 million

              veterans who are currently enrolled in the VA health

              care system have been assigned to priority groups 7 and 8;

              not all of those veterans seek medical care from VA in any

              given year.

              Those you would have me volunteer with are not in groups seven or eight.

              I get it. You hate republicans. I get it. But this is not the hill you want to die on. Find a relevant republican travesty and get onboard the hate republican bandwagon for that one. This is a non-starter.

                #1.15 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:17 PM EDT
                btco

                Those you would have me volunteer with are not in groups seven or eight.

                Wrong again!

                Oh, but there are many that receive care at the VA in my area that have 0% rated disabilities when they separated from service.

                One guy I know from there has incredible back pain that has never been rated as a problem by the VA. Others in the same boat have PTSD that was never diagnosed.

                So really, go tell these guys, thanks for your service, but due to fake assed calls of "waste", you are @!$%# out of luck.

                These are real people with real problems, not some inconvenient little waste of a budget item. These are our American Heros the GOP is tossing aside.

                Again, heartless GOP bull@!$%#.

                • 4 votes
                #1.16 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:02 PM EDT
                Felicitie

                They are not unfounded calls of waste. A veteran simply needs to prove that the injury is service connected and they can then be put into higher categories that aren't proposed to be cut.

                At any rate, I can see that you are steadfast in your beliefs. Thank you for the debate.

                Be well.

                  #1.17 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:09 PM EDT
                  btco

                  A veteran simply needs to prove that the injury is service connected and they can then be put into higher categories that aren't proposed to be cut.

                  You really do not understand this issue do you? Seriously, go volunteer, meet these people, help them.

                  Last week in Lusby, Maryland, an inactive U.S. Marine thought to be suffering from PTSD was involved in a police standoff when he threatened suicide and refused to leave his house. This week it was announced that the suicide rate among Army National Guard and Reserve soldiers nearly doubled last year.

                  .....

                  Walker herself cares for a disabled veteran -- her son, who served in the Iraq war. In her experience, the first problem is that obtaining veterans disability benefits through the VA can be difficult and time-consuming. VA delays in eligibility determinations can keep vets from getting the help they need early enough to prevent such tragedies.

                  More alarming is that the 41% jobless rate may be a conservative estimate. That's especially true for veterans who return with two signature disabilities of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq: post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI), which frequently go undiagnosed.

                  According to statistics compiled in a recent study by Cornell University researchers, nearly 20% of recently returning service members from Iraq and Afghanistan screened positive for depression or PTSD, while some 19% of troops received a probable TBI during deployment. Moreover, about 30% have more than one disability, further complicating veterans' diagnoses and treatment.

                  Recent estimates report nearly 300,000 veterans currently suffer from PTSD or major depression, and that 320,000 veterans experienced a traumatic brain injury in deployment (RAND, 2007). Only about half of those who meet criteria for PTSD or major depression have sought treatment.

                  The GOP's plans are heartless, hopeless and will lead to more suffering among our nations hero's.

                  This is not a debate, this is a big part of my life. I am a better person for having them in my life. To cut funding to people like these folks is NOT a "debate" and helping them is NOT a "waste".

                  That's what you don't get. Too bad.

                  Go volunteer.

                  • 4 votes
                  #1.18 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 1:47 PM EDT
                  Felicitie

                  VA delays in eligibility determinations can keep vets from getting the help they need early enough to prevent such tragedies.

                  This is a fault of bureaucracy, not a fault of funding.

                  Done. Sorry.

                    #1.19 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:28 PM EDT
                    btco

                    Done. Sorry.

                    Paul Ryan is that you?

                    • 4 votes
                    #1.20 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 2:54 PM EDT
                    Reply
                    28az

                    Bring the troop home and leave the Vet on VA health care period, we do not need to stay fighting in the other country our citizens and Vents come first. We do not care what happen in the other country close our border and do not allow any of them to enter our country at all, we do not need the type of people in our country.

                      Reply#2 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 8:55 AM EDT
                      Kavika

                      Power, I am neither dem or repub. I don't think that either party is worth the powder to blow them to hell. That said, both parties have been screwing the vets since WWI. This is nothing new for politicians. They wave the flag, but when the rubber hits the road they are useless. I do speak from experience. I am a combat vet with a small disability and my son is a disabled Marine Vet, with 75% disability. Having lived with a disability during both parties turn in power, I see no difference between them when it comes to vet's. Sad as that maybe, it is what it is. As for Ryan's proposal, I would back it if all politicians had their private health care packages, paid for by the taxpayer, taken away and they where put on tri-care, medicare or medicaid. Then you would see a whole different story.

                      Thanks for the post Power.

                      • 1 vote
                      Reply#3 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:02 AM EDT
                      FLYNAVY1

                      Ryan and the GOP thought that they had it rough with the backlash about Medicare. They forget what veterans have for the most part a predisposition for something, and many trained to make use of that predisposition. There may be a rivalry between the branches, but we were all trained to operate as a team. You can bet this will come into play if we hear too much "noise" about cutting Veteran's benefits.

                      • 9 votes
                      #3.1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:28 AM EDT
                      chitownty

                      Oh yeah!

                      • 1 vote
                      #3.2 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 4:55 PM EDT
                      Cletus Wilbury

                      In Chernow's Washington I've been reading how our first Congress never did pay soldiers in the Continental Army for their service during the Revolution. Kinda like how they didn't feed & cloth (sufficiently) them during the war.

                      Googled, this sounds like a similar description:

                      Newburgh Conspiracy (Wiki entry)

                      With the end of the war and dissolution of the Continental Army approaching, soldiers who had long been unpaid feared that Congress would not meet previous promises concerning back pay and pensions. Congress, at the mercy of the states for all revenue, had no money and could not pay more than a fraction of the money owed.

                      ...

                      Congress finally resolved the crisis by giving a sum equal to five years pay to each officer entitled to half-pay-for life.

                      ...

                      Congress gave each soldier three months pay...

                      Such a grateful nation we are.

                      • 1 vote
                      #3.3 - Tue Jun 14, 2011 4:13 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      Chum

                      Our priorities are definitely screwed up. Personally, I think military service should be required of all politicians as a prerequisite. Maybe that would make them think a little more about the effects of their decisions. And yes, I'm a veteran--Army.

                      • 5 votes
                      Reply#4 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:20 AM EDT
                      PowerIsKnowledge

                      I've always thought that Chum.

                      • 4 votes
                      #4.1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:22 AM EDT
                      FLYNAVY1

                      I second the motion.

                      • 6 votes
                      #4.2 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:29 AM EDT
                      Kavika

                      Agreed.

                      • 4 votes
                      #4.3 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:31 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      madvargr

                      I speak for a man who gave for this land
                      took a bullet in the back for his pay
                      spilled his blood in the dirt and the dust
                      and he's come back to say
                      That what he has seen is hard to believe
                      and it does no good just to pray
                      he asks of us to stand, and we must
                      end this war today
                      With his mind he's saying, no more
                      With his heart he's saying, no more
                      With his life he's saying, no more war
                      With his eyes he's saying, no more
                      With his body he's saying, no more
                      With his body he's saying, no more war
                      Nothing's too good for a Veteran
                      yeh, this is what they say
                      so nothing is what they will get
                      in this new American way

                      No More - Pearl Jam

                      I'll just leave this here...

                      • 8 votes
                      Reply#5 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:41 AM EDT
                      mgbirish

                      Typical GOP, cut benefits for us veterans, but keep the tax breaks for their Defense contractor allies!!

                      • 8 votes
                      Reply#6 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:21 AM EDT
                      PowerIsKnowledge

                      Yes it is typical of them, mgbirish.

                      • 6 votes
                      #6.1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:28 AM EDT
                      btco

                      Can I simply add a hearty @!$%# YOU GOP?

                      • 7 votes
                      #6.2 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 1:03 PM EDT
                      Reply
                      rougy77

                      Republicans support the wars, and to hell with the troops.

                      The GOP has been hiding behind the troops for ten years now, and this is the thanks they get.

                      • 6 votes
                      Reply#7 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 10:46 AM EDT
                      Kavika

                      roughy77, were you around during Vietnam? There is no difference between the parties when it comes to Vet's. They both suck.

                      • 1 vote
                      #7.1 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:18 AM EDT
                      Reply
                      Maurice Henderson

                      It's the GOP...that's not a surprise. People's expectations of the GOP often exceeds the GOP's abilities... They just can't get it together.

                      • 3 votes
                      Reply#8 - Mon Jun 13, 2011 11:57 AM EDT
                      Leave a Comment:
                      You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
                      You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
                      (XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
                      Newsvine Privacy Statement
                      As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
                      FUN STUFF:
                      • Leaderboard |
                      • E-Mail Alerts |
                      • Top of the Vine |
                      • Newsvine Live |
                      • Newsvine Archives |
                      • The Greenhouse |
                      COMPANY STUFF:
                      • Code of Honor |
                      • Company Info |
                      • Contact Us |
                      • Jobs |
                      • User Agreement |
                      • Privacy Policy |
                      • About our ads
                      LEGAL STUFF:
                      • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
                      • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com