Newsvine
  • Welcome
  • Help
  • Report Bug
  • Conversation Tracker
  • Your Column
  • Replies
  • Friends
Type Comments Since You Last CheckedArticle Source Last Checked Stop Tracking All Clear Tracking All
Advertise | AdChoices
Log In | Register
Close the Login Panel
Existing users log in below. New users please register for a free account.

New Users:

Existing Users:

E-Mail:
Password:
Forgot Password?
Please enter the e-mail address or domain name you registered with:
E-Mail/Domain:
Back to Login
Log Out
  • Top News
  • Local News
  • World
  • U.S.
  • Sports
  • Politics
  • Tech
  • Entertainment
  • Science
  • Business
  • Health
  • Odd News
  • More
    • Arts
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Fashion
    • History
    • Home & Garden
    • Not News
    • Religion
    • Travel
Visit PowerIsKnowledge's column >>

POWERISKNOWLEDGE

Home Page
Gashki'ewizi
Articles Posted: 150  Links Seeded: 1793
Member Since: 9/2008  Last Seen: 5/17/2012

What is Newsvine?

Updated continuously by citizens like you, Newsvine is an instant reflection of what the world is talking about at any given moment.

Get a Free Account
Help
Fun Stuff
  • Your Clippings
  • Leaderboard
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Top of the Vine
  • Newsvine Live
  • Newsvine Archives
  • The Greenhouse
  • Recommended Articles
  • Wall of Vineness
Put a Seed Newsvine link on your own site

Three Good Reasons to Let the High-End Bush Tax Cuts Disappear This Year

Seeded on Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:04 AM EDT
Read ArticleArticle Source: Center for American Progress
business, obama, economy, republicans, bush, gop, small-business, taxes, clinton, conservatives, michael-linden, michael-ettlinger
Seeded by PowerIsKnowledge
Advertise | AdChoices

1. Billions of dollars in tax breaks for the wealthy is just about the least efficient use of that money.

Extending the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy will cost about $80 billion over just the next two years, and frankly, that $80 billion could be put to much better use than simply giving it to the richest 2 percent of Americans.

2. The Bush tax cuts didn't deliver what they promised.

They didn't deliver. The economy boasted 132 million jobs in June of 2001, the month that the first of the Bush tax cuts was signed into law. Three years later, in June of 2004, there were just 131.4 million jobs. The economy did not add a single new job during three years under the Bush tax cuts.

3. The tax cuts for nearly all Americans and American small businesses would stay in place.

Of course, conservatives often argue that we will harm small businesses if we let the tax rates for these richest 2 percent go back to what they were under President Clinton. The data belie that claim. A recent report from the Joint Committee on Taxation points out that less than 3 percent of all taxpayers with any positive business income at all—big or small—would be affected by the increase in rates.

  • Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.

Published to:

  • PowerIsKnowledge's Column, All of Newsvine
  • Groups: American History
  • Regions: Washington DC
  • Public Discussion (5)
PowerIsKnowledge

Lower taxes for the rich don’t help the economy, they cost too much, the money could be put to much better use, and nearly everyone in the country would be completely unaffected if we simply let the rates go back to where they were under President Clinton. If conservatives really want tax relief, let them join with progressives to pass permanent tax cuts for 98 percent of Americans. If they want to continue protecting tax breaks for the rich in spite of all the evidence against them, they are free to do so, but they shouldn’t hold everyone else’s tax returns hostage in the meantime.

If the racists can get beyond their hate they could acknowledge this instead of supporting the money-hungry/power-hungry thugs.

  • 5 votes
Reply#1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:08 AM EDT
Fufu

The economy boasted 132 million jobs in June of 2001, the month that the first of the Bush tax cuts was signed into law. Three years later, in June of 2004, there were just 131.4 million jobs.

Sir, I'm going to have to ask that you put your facts and statistics away. We're trying to have a political discussion here.

  • 5 votes
#1.1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:21 AM EDT
Reply
Brian-497171

But Reagan taught us that if we fellate the rich, they will treat us all nice like.

  • 4 votes
Reply#2 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:25 AM EDT
socialjustice

Republicans do not deserve to win this November. We should have learned what they would do during the Bush Years.

Democrats have the task of building a better future with Republicans blocking every attempt with distortion of the facts, denial of the history, and bigoted culture wars to distract us.

Democrats are doing the hard work of building, while it's easy for the Republicans to tear everything down.

Democrats should not be punished for their hard work. We need patience, persistence, and perspiration to build a better future.

  • 3 votes
Reply#3 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:31 AM EDT
PowerIsKnowledge

So true socialjustice and democrats will win in November if we put forth the same energy we did to get President Obama elected.

  • 1 vote
#3.1 - Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:54 AM EDT
Reply
Leave a Comment:
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
You're in XHTML Mode. If you prefer, you can use Easy Mode instead.
(XHTML tags allowed - a,b,blockquote,br,code,dd,dl,dt,del,em,h2,h3,h4,i,ins,li,ol,p,pre,q,strong,ul)
Newsvine Privacy Statement
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
FUN STUFF:
  • Leaderboard |
  • E-Mail Alerts |
  • Top of the Vine |
  • Newsvine Live |
  • Newsvine Archives |
  • The Greenhouse |
COMPANY STUFF:
  • Code of Honor |
  • Company Info |
  • Contact Us |
  • Jobs |
  • User Agreement |
  • Privacy Policy |
  • About our ads
LEGAL STUFF:
  • © 2005-2012 Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
  • Newsvine is a property of msnbc.com