A plot of Wall Street interests to overthrow President Roosevelt and establish a Fascist dictatorship, backed by a private army of 500,000 ex-soldiers and others, was charged by Major Gen. Smedley D. Butler, retired Marine Corps officer, who appeared yesterday before the House of Representatives Committee on Un-American Activities, which began hearings on the charges.
Gen. Butler Bares 'Fascist Plot' To Seize Government by Force; Says Bond Salesman, as Representative of Wall St. Group, Asked Him to Lead Army of 500,000 in March on Capital -- Those Named Make Angry Denials -- Dickstein Gets Charge. GEN. BUTLER BARES A '
- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (99)
And big business is still at it. Will they ever give up?
- 21 votes
And big business is still at it. Will they ever give up?
No.
- 10 votes
They were trying to get rid of that Commie FDR, that's what is was all about. Wish we'd had Presidential term limits back then.
Wish we'd had Presidential term limits back then.
Bad news then, as that is one of the many Constitutional Amendments that some on the far right wish to do away with.
Crazy, eh?
- 8 votes
Ah, we are nearing an election, expect more and more of this drivel to be written. Remember when Bush was going to not give way to Obama with a coup supported by the military? It was written up, right here on the vine.
- 4 votes
aqua surf-1123675
They were trying to get rid of that Commie FDR, that's what is was all about. Wish we'd had Presidential term limits back then.
So, even though the public repeatedly voted FDR in, you think the will of the voters (who were clearly pleased with FDR's leadership through a very difficult time) and the judgment of a multitude of historians who have since declared FDR to be one of the all-time greatest Presidents of our nation are less important than your petty axe to grind with his policies?
You don't care that had FDR not stepped in with some reasonable balances to capitalism that we likely would have devolved into REAL communism, not fake communism that gets right-wing nutjobs like you tearing your hair out, but real actual Politburo Comrade Soviet Russia Job Takes YOU communism due to the catastrophic failure of business to regulate itself?
Party and ideology before country, I guess that's how you right wingers roll.
Term limits are an inherently undemocratic creation. They are the butthurt response of losers to LOSING an election, and they assume that the voters are children and not capable of deciding for themselves whether or not their elected leaders are the right ones.
I think the 2-term limit is an insult to Democracy and should be abolished. All it says is "voters, we don't trust you to choose what's in your best interest."
- 10 votes
I would also like to point out the term limits that the GOP promised they'd adhere to in their 1994 "Contract On America" were completely ignored, and the only way the GOP's class of 1994 were encouraged to leave office was by losing elections or retiring on their own initiative.
Or, like Newt Gingrich and Tom Delay, forced out by an angry public tired of their unethical and in Delay's case ILLEGAL shenanigans.
So when the GOP talks about term limits, remember they only mean for others, not for themselves.
- 7 votes
Remember when Bush was going to not give way to Obama with a coup supported by the military?
Ah yes, I remember that. Not from the vine, but elsewhere. One of Bush's many presidential decrees. The president can call marshal law for any natural or man-made disaster and suspend any and all elections. Effectively making him a dictator. Or President for life if you prefer that term.
Personally I think Cheney would have loved that. He was the real power behind the throne so to speak and George was but a puppet king.
- 5 votes
Hey Space Guy - remember when Bush said how much better his job would be if he were a dictator? Remember the second time he said it? Oh yeah - the fear was all just liberal craziness - nothing we could have gotten by his words or deeds, right?
Oh look - there's Smedley's book, "War is a Racket" right over there on my bookshelf.
http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm
War is a racket. It always has been. It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives. A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small 'inside' group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.
I spent 33 years and four months in active military service and during that period I spent most of my time as a high class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and the bankers. In short, I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. I helped purify Nicaragua for the International Banking House of Brown Brothers in 1902-1912. I brought light to the Dominican Republic for the American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make Honduras right for the American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927 I helped see to it that Standard Oil went on its way unmolested. Looking back on it, I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was to operate his racket in three districts. I operated on three continents.
What would he say about our involvement in Iraq...
- 4 votes
maximillio "I would also like to point out the term limits that the GOP promised they'd adhere to in their 1994 "Contract On America" were completely ignored, and the only way the GOP's class of 1994 were encouraged to leave office was by losing elections or retiring on their own initiative.
kind of like today's republican strategy - lie and distort the truth as much and as often as possible because if enough BS is thrown on the wall some will stick.
- 5 votes
One frosty dawn in November 1935, 500,000 War veterans rolled out of their blankets in the pine barrens around the CCC camp at Elkridge, Md. The brassy bugle notes of "Assembly" hurried them to the camp's parade ground, where, mounted on a white horse and surrounded by his staff, they found their leader, Major General Smedley Darlington ("Old Gimlet Eye") Butler, U. S. M. C., retired.
- 5 votes
Apparently one must either be a subscriber or pay to see the whole article. Interesting, but why are you posting some very old news today?
- 7 votes
Could it be.....perhaps that KNOWLEDGE really is POWER. That seems a concept that the right doesn't seem to understand though.
- 17 votes
Apparently one must either be a subscriber or pay to see the whole article.
Read more here:
- 8 votes
Apparently one must either be a subscriber or pay to see the whole article. Interesting, but why are you posting some very old news today?
Gen. Smedley Butler is explored in "The Corporation" here is a short excerpt. There are other sources on the web for more indepth information Gnostix.
KNOWLEDGE really is POWER. That seems a concept that the right doesn't seem to understand though.
Would that were so DA, the reason we're in the pickle we're today in is precisely becausethe right understands quite well how to make "information" and then to disseminate it. They understand quite fully the incredible power of propaganda based populism. The duped believe themselves as fully empowered by "knowledge" as the next guy.
Education and a discerning considerate mind is really power... for with them all ghost stories wither; without them every twig snap in the jungle can too easily be morphed into hellspawn demons and literal stampedes of unreason unleashed.
- 14 votes
I'd read this story ages ago. It surprised me then that anyone had gone to such lengths to over throw our government. Over the past decade we've slowly seen the ground work laid for another such attempt.
Troublesome.
- 9 votes
I think it important since most might have heard the phrase "history repeats itself" and if the GOP regains its power, I certainly can see how they might use the military and other means to overthrow our government.
This right-wing talk of doing away with Constitutional amendments, etc. is key. I also hear rumblings about another Bush waiting in the wings for another crack at taking America down.
- 1 vote
100thmonkeync - I would be much more worried about some of these private security companies such as Blackwater then I would the military.
- 4 votes
NavChief57: Agreed! that is why I said "other means" in the mix, but should have perhaps crystallized the picture a bit more. Blackwater, known by its new name "Xe" is definitely a likely and worrisome entity.
- 2 votes
Erik Prince reportedly has in his possession either the bullet or the gun that killed a US President. I can't remember which and I am not interested in it enough to Google it again. Suffice it to say, he's one sick puppy. I hear he is leaving the USA and good riddance. He has zero respect for Democracy and is a dangerous individual who flaunts the law with impunity.
- 6 votes
Thanks, I did a bit of research on him. A pretty picture it is not.
- 3 votes
Butler is certainly relevant today. If for nothing else, his speech "War is a Racket".
- 13 votes
Corporations now have the right to throw as much money as they want to their candidate of choice . This kind of legislation doesn't happen overnight . Thanks for the historical context !
Freedom is a constant battle and tyrants are always waiting in the wings to exploit the masses !
- 22 votes
Freedom is a constant battle and tyrants are always waiting in the wings to exploit the masses !
seems so.
It's a real travesty that the right leaning SCOTUS ruled in favor of giving corporate mouths the legal megaphones necessary to completely drown out the voices of actual US citizens. Shows you where their hearts were, eh?
- 13 votes
joel-367258 wrote,
"Corporations now have the right to throw as much money as they want to their candidate of choice"
Yes, just like the unions did for their boy in Colorado. Let’s not forget the millions they sent to the candidate in the Arkansas democratic race, alas the guy they backed lost.
Now the playing field is level.
**NavChief57, did you do the full thirty?
- 1 vote
Poed Plenty - no and I was P Oed plenty about it. Screwed up my leg and wasn't able to run a mile and a half in the required time, only thing I couldn't do. They found me unfit for sea duty. Now tell me, where on a 400 foot frigate am I going to need to run a mile or more. I could swim like a fish and tread water forever which it seemed to me would come in much more handy. Anyway unfit for sea unfit for the Navy. I volunteered for instructor duty as I was qualified and enjoy teaching but no go. 12 years 1 month.
- 2 votes
Thanks for your service Chief. I did the full monty, lifer type as they say.
- 1 vote
P Oed - it would have helped things if I had sent the FR then! Just sent it, sorry about that!
- 2 votes
I've speculated on the possibility of armed revolt to establish a fascist government in the USA today. We have the fascists. They are subversive. Trial balloons of revolt, revolution, and secession are floated by elected representatives, even, with no ill push-back. There are large mercenary armies and intelligence agencies in the USA today, largely if not completely un-regulated, and certainly capable of operating in secret. There are a number of rich, powerful, and very nasty right-wingers who are intellectually and emotionally capable of fomenting a fascist uprising. And so on.
I expect this gets more than just talked about today. I expect threats of violence by the right-wing will increase as the election gets closer. Thanks for bringing this up.
- 23 votes
Did any of you read the whole story? It was a joke ... It never happened. OMG ! Had any of you made it to page 3 of the story
From San Francisco, Socialist Norman Thomas wryly doubted that "it would be worth $3,000,000 to any Wall Street group to attempt to overthrow the Government under the present Administration, because Wall Street and Big Business have flourished under it more than any other group."
What no bash Palin or Beck articles available today !
- 2 votes
Seriously, a revolution against the current American government? With so many Americans freeloading who are financed by the current government they would not stand to lose their free public housing, welfare, food stamps, free breakfast and lunch for their children and free health care.
- 2 votes
Jim44 It most certainly did happen.
I helped make Mexico, (Gen. Butler) especially Tampico, safe for American oil interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefits of Wall Street. The record of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-1912 (where have I heard that name before?). I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. In China I helped to see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested.
In 1934 General Smedley D. Butler went public after he was approached by Wall Street and offered up to 300 million dollars to lead an army of 500,00 veterans equipped with munitions from Remington Arms Company to Washington D.C., in order to overthrow the U.S. Government by force. The plot was investigated by the McCormack-Dickstein committee, which found General Butler to be telling the truth.(*)
Jules Archer's book, The Plot to Seize the White House, was written with the cooperation of senators, reporters, former Speaker of the House of Representatives John W. McCormack, former editors of the Philadelphia Inquirer, and the Philadelphia Record, and the immediate family of General Smedley Butler who provided military records, scrapbooks, memorabilia, recordings, etc. In his book Archer states, "School texts ... are uniquely silent about the powerful Americans who plotted to seize the White House with a private army, hold President Franklin D. Roosevelt prisoner, and get rid of him if he refused to serve as their puppet in a dictatorship they planned to impose and control."
The Business Plot (also the Plot Against FDR and the White House Putsch) was a supposed political conspiracy in 1933. Retired Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler claimed that wealthy businessmen were plotting to create a fascistveterans' organization and use it in a coup d’état to overthrow United States President Franklin D. Roosevelt, with Butler as leader of that organization. In 1934 Butler testified to the McCormack-Dickstein Congressional committee on these claims.Schlesinger, p. 85In the opinion of the committee, these allegations were credible. One of the purported plotters, Gerald MacGuire, vehemently denied any such plot. In their report, the Congressional committee stated that it was able to confirm Butler's statements other than the proposal from MacGuire which it considered more or less confirmed by MacGuire's European reports. No one was prosecuted.
It's history repeating itself.
I learned about this while reading Jesse Ventura's book American Conspiracies.
- 6 votes
your own article says its a lie ... why post the article then say its wrong...page three of the time article quotes MacArthur and others mocking the theory of the story!
Power I am not being an ass just wondering... And Fascism is government taking over government not business taking over the government. Is it not?
- 1 vote
And Fascism is government taking over government not business taking over the government. Is it not?
Actually there are many definitions for Fascism. They seem to differ depending on the source. Here is one from the World English Dictionary:
1. any ideology or movement inspired by Italian Fascism, such as German National Socialism; any right-wing nationalist ideology or movement with an authoritarian and hierarchical structure that is fundamentally opposed to democracy and liberalism
2. any ideology, movement, programme, tendency, etc, that may be characterized as right-wing, chauvinist, authoritarian, etc
3. prejudice in relation to the subject specified: body fascism
As far as the validity to Major General Butler and the coup d'état. It is taught in our local public schools. Hope this clears things up for you. Of course there will be denials. I think there are those who say the holocaust never happened either.
- 6 votes
Read the Wikipedia article on Smedley Butler. The Marine Corps considered him too unreliable to send to the western front in WWI. He was fired by the mayor from the job of Philadelphia's police chief because he trampled on the civil rights of the citizens. And he alleged that 500,000 veterans had descended on Washington to support the plot. How do 500,000 people keep a secret? How do they go unnoticed in 1930s Washington?
If you belief this, you should have time for the tooth fairy, UFOs, etc.
Jesse Ventura is about as reliable as Smedley Butler. If this had been ancient Rome, under Caligula or Nero, for example, or Stalinist Russia, many people would have lost their lives over this. Fortunately this is America and it (the allegation of a plot) was objectively investigated became the minor footnote in history it deserves to be.
The Marine Corps considered him too unreliable to send to the western front in WWI.
Butler was a multiply-decorated veteran. Dispute his record if you dare. You'd better have your own schit in order, though.
And he alleged that 500,000 veterans had descended on Washington to support the plot.
He alleged no such thing. Way to strawman an argument.
You're done here.
- 2 votes
Jesse Ventura is about as reliable as Smedley Butler.
And yet everything I've read in his book, thus far, can be substantiated.
- 5 votes
Interesting. Not one mention of Prescott Bush.
- 6 votes
He was up to his ears in it. As he was in a number of things that Americans today would find shocking if they could stand to actually listen to the truth of that family. He also sold arms to both sides during WWII.
- 10 votes
At the height of the cold war, a weakened President and a popular four-star general face off in a battle for control of the US government. President Jordan Lyman has successfully negotiated an arms reduction treaty with the Soviet Union, but his measure is unpopular and does not sit well with General James Mattoon Scott, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who has been quite vocal in his opposition. Marine Corps Col. Jiggs Casey, who works for Scott, comes to the conclusion that senior military officers are plotting a coup to overthrow the government. Working with a small circle of reliable and loyal officials, President Lyman tries to get the evidence of Scott's treachery and stop him.
- 1 vote
Probably this video best explains that timing..
Was it really a plot or the musings of some wealthy, or some other variation? As the video explains... there were not really any laws against such conversations in that time period.
- 4 votes
hsquared:
Thanks for the vid. Most interesting.
best atcha
- 2 votes
Monday, Dec. 03, 1934...............National Affairs: Plot Without Plotters ????? B.S.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,929957-3,00.html
- 1 vote
Seizing the government by force is so last century. Thanks to our glorious Supreme Court, they can simply buy it now...will that be Visa or Mastercard?
- 6 votes
American (or for that matter, worldwide) politics has become such a labyrinth of overlapping & interlocking distortion, deception and duplicity that 'reporting' on it is a job that could only be done by folks like Kurt Vonnegut, or maybe Franz Kafka. About the only thing we know for sure is that we can't find out anything worth knowing in time for it to make any difference or do any good. Case in point: interesting (and ominous & scary) as this article (& other sources cited in the thread) really is, it's also really time & energy invested in debate about events that happened 75 years ago!!
"Proverbs for Paranoids: If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about the answers..." Thomas Pynchon, Gravity's Rainbow
- 5 votes
This story is 75 years old. What is it doing here?
Because Butler's speech that "war is a racket" is as relevant today as in the early 1900's. Read it and you will see. And I believe this guy won two Medals of Honor so he no America hater or pinko.
- 3 votes
I have no respect for a guy who spends his whole career in the military, collects a military pension, and then becomes a pacifist. Read his Wiki bio. He was a fruitcake who just happened wear a lot of fruit salad on his chest.
And don't trust anyone named Smedley.
Joe
The story is here to keep certain of the masses stirred up.
Ralph
Yep, Butler was right about war.
Joe again.
It seems to me that guys who spend a lifetime, or maybe a big part of it, fighting wars and/or being involved in the planning for war, are the best ones to see it for what it is.
With the numbers of our soldiers having mental issues with the two wars of today as evidenced by the suicide rate among them, it's easy to see that war has a tendency to make anyone a "fruitcake."
- 1 vote
Joe: Easy to dismiss Smedley as a fruitcake, but I think he is generally right and if I recollect even Gen Eisenhower said to beware the military industrial complex so was he a fruitcake also for questioning what the motive of some of these profiteers was, I don't think so, both were generals and had to deal with the politics and intrigue of the war business while he rest of us are just feed a line about enemies and weapons needs to keep the money flowing to the corporations.
- 2 votes
Joe - Soldiers train very hard long hours to go fight in wars, 99% hope they never have too. What better person to speak about peace than a person who knows war and the horrors it brings upon the world first hand?
- 4 votes
With you nothing surprises me
Really? I must not be shocking enough, maybe I need to re-new my vigor.
;~)
- 4 votes
Yes, you don't want to become predictable, wouldn't be much fun anymore.
- 3 votes
Oh @!$%# being stuck with you two in a rowboat LMAO I'd have to jump overboard ; }
That's probably a good idea, because if I were stuck in a boat, I'd be talking cannibalism before the first sunset.
No point in waiting for things to get ugly, I get hungry!
- 2 votes
People are agitated over a 75 year old story of dubious value?
Someone please let me know when it will be safe to come out of the bunker. My number's in the book.
- 1 vote
J. W. Welch
People are agitated over a 75 year old story of dubious value?
There's nothing dubious about it. It's well-documented. If you have a refutation of this story present it right here and right now or shut up.
People are agitated because those times seem like these, and once again when a President challenges the status quo, there are those who are benefiting handsomely from that status quo who will do anything they can to keep it that way. And it's no more unimaginable today than it was 70 years ago.
- 3 votes
max
A refutation of the story? Not hardly. A different take. Absolutely.
What I got from the video is that the existence of a plot has never been conclusively proven beyond the testimony of Gen. Butler and some investigation by a congressional committee. It appears that much was not looked into very closely, maybe because of where the questions were leading. FDR himself may have downplayed the whole thing.
The whole scenario is plausible, I suppose. No question it makes for great theater. Whether any similar sounding plot exists today might be an easy sell for the gullible. If you want to be scared out of your jockeys with every doom and gloom story that comes along, that's your affair.Try looking at the bright side: according to some the moment the repubs regain the WH and congress all will be well.
You are agitated because you are agitated. Hysteria has a habit of feeding on itself, especially among the poor souls most prone to it.
As to your demand to "shut up", that won't be happening anytime soon. Sorry.
- 1 vote
Aha!!!
Another gotcha! story. Or is it about, 'those who do not lear from history are doomed to repeat it'? This is not a case of everything old being 'new' again.
Wall Street, Corporate takeover of the government? Controlling the voice of the electorate?
I willl pose a sensible question here. If you punch a clock or report to a supervisor or a manager, or whatever the chain of command is at your chosen workplace, what makes you believe that any of the uber-wealthy wants to change places with any of us. Why do you think that those who rachet-jaw in front of the camera as their reps always add a 'personal spin' on whatever new policy they are presenting to us? These mouth-pieces are being told what to report and how to report it.
These talking heads are making millions, and if you think they want a tax increase on their newly-found wealth, you've got another think coming. I don't give a damn if it's Rush, Maddow, Brietbart, Olberman, Sanchez, Gregory, Palin, Robinson, Couric, Beck or whoever is in front of a camera or a microphone, or posting on the Internet, when it's reporting time, these are the newly-wealthy who keep us at one another throats. And almost every damned one of them have become writers of best-selling books!!! Sheeeesh!!!
Do you really believe that only Fox news is guilty of 'subliminal suggestion', and all the other media outlets are fairly and accurately reporting to us whatever is happening in current policies that might restore the middle class? Unbiased reporting? If that 's the name of an old song, hum me a few bars and I just might remember the words.
All new media is part of that 'big business' world whose 'evil' is being debated here. Here's a newsflash, their bottom line is their profit report on their balance sheets. When they report a story on policy-making news, immediately after they report the story, they bring in the 'pundits' and 'experts' to dismantle whatever can be derived as positive. And almost every damned one of them have become writers of best-selling books!!
And like a bunch of sheep, we run towards whichever sound-byte that suits our particular party leaning. Before you ask, who is the 'they' I speak of here? All media outlets belong to Corporate 'profit-gathering' America. Have you got that? Talk about needing a wake-up and smell the coffee moment!!
I am not against the news being reported. We need to know what's going on in our world. The news of years past can surely be used to explain what is happening today, but don't be in denial about how duplicitous it is, especially if you used to belong to that group that was once called the middle-class.
..........Remember?
Two Medals of Honor and he lived to tell about it! The take-away from this is:
1. Clearly he was an accomplished fibber and teller of tall tales before he alleged this "plot."
2. The Dept. of the Navy's awards office was screwed up long before John "Swiftboat" Kerry walked up the gangplank.
From Marines.com: Awarded the Medal of Honor for Bravery in back-to-back campaigns.
Not only did Major General Smedley Butler distinguish himself as one of two Marines to earn two Medals of Honor, he earned the prestigious medals in back-to-back campaigns. MajGen Butler earned his first Medal in 1914, commanding Marine forces during the United States’ occupation of Vera Cruz. A year later, he earned his second Medal for "bravery and forceful leadership" as a commanding officer during the Haitian Occupation. Butler served for 34 years before retiring from duty. Marine Corps Base Camp Butler, in Okinawa, Japan, is named in his honor.
Joe - sorry but you obviously don't have any knowledge of what it takes to be awarded the MOH, but you apparently trust wingnut sites. My friend you don't have a clue!
- 5 votes
Don't talk @!$%# on Smedley Butler, you obviously don't know anything about him.
- 4 votes
Nonsense, this guy's bio was as hinckey as all get up. Google him. You obviously haven't yet.
Medal of Honor 1:
After the occupation of Veracruz, many military personnel received the Medal of Honor, an unusually high number that diminished somewhat the prestige of the award. The Army presented one, nine went to Marines and 46 were bestowed upon Navy personnel. During World War I, Butler, then a major, attempted to return his Medal, explaining he had done nothing to deserve it. The medal was returned with orders to keep it and to wear it as well.
Joe - that is called Honor!
- 4 votes
Medal of Honor 2:
For extraordinary heroism in action as Commanding Officer of detachments from the 5th, 13th, 23d Companies and the Marine and sailor detachment from the U.S.S. Connecticut, Major Butler led the attack on Fort Riviere, Haiti, 17 November 1915. Following a concentrated drive, several different detachments of Marines gradually closed in on the old French bastion fort in an effort to cut off all avenues of retreat for the Caco bandits. Reaching the fort on the southern side where there was a small opening in the wall, Major Butler gave the signal to attack and Marines from the 15th Company poured through the breach, engaged the Cacos in hand-to-hand combat, took the bastion and crushed the Caco resistance. Throughout this perilous action, Major Butler was conspicuous for his bravery and forceful leadership.
Bravery, Honor, Leadership - something you Joe obviously don't have a clue about.
- 4 votes
BG Butler was a brave Marine.
To any relative of his or to any U.S. combat veteran whom I offended with my intemperate remarks I apologize for insulting BG Butler's military decorations, his service to the Nation, and his memory.
As a token of my sincerity I will no longer post on this site.
- 2 votes
Joe - no need to leave the site, if you have something to say, feel free. You manned up and admitted you were mistaken, that I can admire. But, don't let making a mistake silence you, just know that if you make a claim, especially one that can be verified, people will check it out.
Chief!
- 5 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



